Comment on Senatus Populusque Sardegna

  1. Knight (Guest) on Chapter 3 Fri 01 Dec 2023 04:26PM UTC

    How many excuses, in the style of you English clowns😂😂.

    1)I’m sorry but nothing would have changed in Taranto with the Eagle. Because the British were unable to sink the Italian ships. (The British did not have the firepower and skills). In fact also the Americans (which were much stronger than the British. In fact, without the U.S., the British would have been destroyed) have tried to sink the battleships of the Littorio class with the B17. But they never managed to sink them.

    2)Cavour was never sunk. It was the Italians who decided not to repair it. Of course you English are good at taking credit you don’t have. But this happens when you study propaganda and not history.

    3)The Regia Marina was a navy of 3rd tier? You have proved once again that you are an incompetent. That besides not knowing the story, you don’t even know about ships. The Royal Navy had more battleships but, were mediocre battleships. They were not even comparable to the level of the battleships class Cavour. The Littorio class was the best battleship class of the Second World War. In fact Cunningham and Sommers ran away every time they saw the Littorio or the Vittorio Veneto. Even during Matapan despite British naval and air superiority, Admiral Pridham-Wippell ran away when he saw the Vittorio Veneto. Then the battlecruisers were the worst ships of ww2. In fact only the British and the Germans had them, but they were useless ships (in fact even the Americans built only 2 because they considered them useless). The Hood was a mediocre ship, and was considered the best English ship😂. Then the Italians had the best class of heavy cruisers (class Zara and Trento), the best class of light cruisers (Capitani Romani class), and the best class of destroyers (Soldato class).

    4)That’s just an excuse. In fact, even the KGV class that were modern battleships, were superior only to the Richelieu class (the worst class of battleships of the Second World War).

    5)The Hood sank in just 3 minutes because it was a mediocre ship. Roma were already broken in two after being hit by the second Fritz x. It took 20 minutes to sink because it was a very strong ship.

    But if England was the luckiest nation of World War II.

    More excuses from an incompetent. The Warspite was hit by the Fritz x in a not serious point and had to be towed by an american tugboats. Because the Warspite was a mediocre and old ship.

    The only problem of the Regia Marina was that nest of traitors called Supermarina. If it wasn’t for Supermarina, the Regia Marina destroyed the Royal Navy. In fact the Regia Marina has humiliated the Royal Navy.

    But talking about history with an English is a waste of time

    Comment Actions

    1. knight7272 on Chapter 3 Fri 01 Dec 2023 05:03PM UTC

      This is blatant pastabooing that frankly I don't think the author wants in his comment section

      There was nothing fundamentally with the Battlecruiser, it was a good ship for its intended job of killing enemy commerce raiding cruisers that threatened British Merchant trade and for the gunboat diplomacy missions.

      > 5) The Hood sank in just 3 minutes because it was a mediocre ship.

      No, it is because Bismarck got a golden BB on Hood and 112.5 tons of cordite propellant detonated at almost exactly the same time causing an explosion with the force of a small nuclear bomb, no ship could have survived 3 magazines exploding at the same time

      You realise you have annoyed a lot of people who like Warspite as she is the most decorated battleship in the RN with 15 battle honours plus 10 from her pre-age of steam and steel predecessors

      Comment Actions

      1. Knight (Guest) on Chapter 3 Tue 05 Dec 2023 03:56PM UTC

        Again with "pastaboo" 😂😂. If you don’t know the story It’s useless for you to keep writing crap.

        Battlecruisers were the most useless ships of ww2 (just think of the Scharnhorst class), and who has competence with ships knows (something you don’t do).

        I’m sorry for you English clowns Hood was a mediocre ship. Learn what many British admirals and captains thought of the Hood. Was the Hood was sunk by a BB that caused an explosion with the force of a small nuclear bomb? 😂😂. How many things are you inventing, are you really ridiculous. The Hood sank because a single Bismarck shell penetrated to a magazine.

        What does it have to do that many people like the Warspite (probably English who don’t understand anything about ships), or that it is the most decorated ship of the Royal Navy. Warspite remains a mediocre and outdated ship during WW2.

        I repeat for the last time. Study history before talking to me. Because I’m tired of wasting my time answering an ignorant

        Comment Actions

        1. knight7272 on Chapter 3 Wed 06 Dec 2023 09:21AM UTC

          i have done the maths, if you do not account for the bursting charge of the propellant, you are looking at an explosion of 0.11 kikotons equal to 2 0.5kt WE.177A Nuclear Depth Charges detonating atthe same but if you account for the bursting charge of the propellant, you are looking at an explosion of 37 kilotons equal to the American Prascilla bomb dropped during the 3rd operation plumbob test in 1957

          Comment Actions